Aye:
Chamberlain, Criswell, E Fairbanks, Foudy, Leslie Gleason,
Green, Lemus, Matthews, Moreno, Pal, Ray, Marie Scott,
Ucciferri, and Worobey
Absent:
Clapp, Earl, and Jimenez
Abstain:
Result:
Dixon
Passed
4.
Mark and Jamie provided an overview of the 2025 HUD Continuum of Care (CoC)
Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO), which was released on November 13, 2025.
The consolidated application is due to HUD by January 14, 2026. Contra Costa County
received approximately $22.3 million in CoC funding in FY 2024. Key changes in the
2025 NOFO include a cap limiting permanent housing funding (Permanent
Supportive Housing and Rapid Rehousing) to no more than 30% of the CoC’s Annual
Renewal Demand (ARD), representing a significant shift from prior years. Tier 1
funding has also been reduced to 30% of ARD, compared to approximately 90% in
previous years, meaning more projects will fall into Tier 2, which is nationally
competitive. Additional changes include newly eligible project types (Transitional
Housing, Supportive Services Only, and Street Outreach), higher scoring for projects
with service participation requirements, and new restrictions related to harm
reduction practices, definitions of sex and gender, and activities perceived as
facilitating racial preferences. Mark and Jamie shared that CoC-funded renewal
projects have been coordinating with H3 to come up with a shortlist of permanent
housing projects to be included in Tier 1 within the new permanent housing funding
cap.
Discussion:
· Council members expressed concern about the potential loss of CoC subsidies
for permanent housing projects as grants expire over the coming year. Staff
noted that while impacts will occur on a rolling basis based on circumstances
for each project, nonetheless a significant number of households may be
affected. Staff emphasized ongoing collaboration between the county and
providers to identify alternative funding sources, temporary subsidy options,
and cross-system strategies to help residents remain housed.
· A Council member with lived experience shared personal concern about being
directly impacted by potential the policy changes. Another Council member
acknowledged the emotional weight of the discussion and emphasized the
importance of centering lived experience voices, particularly given the
uncertainty created by the policy changes.
· Discussion also included how HUD Opportunity Zones factor into application
scoring and concerns regarding how geographic boundaries may
disadvantage certain communities.